Category: reading life (Page 6 of 8)

Reading Challenge (Day 2)

This one was rockier than I expected. Two hours is a long time, yo! I made it — eventually — by reading while the kids and husband watched our Family Movie Night movie (The Aristocats, in case any are wondering).

Finished Labyrinth, and while the last chapter made me a little wistful, as Sarah returns home, puts away some of the childish things she was clinging to, and sees Ludo, Sir Didymus, and Hoggle in the mirror, I still stand by what I said earlier: The book needed to be less faithful to the movie. Yes, I know this is not the point at all of doing a movie tie-in novelization, but still. The movie’s magic is the movie’s magic; the book didn’t quite get there for me. I’m glad I read it, though, if for no other reason than it makes me want to re-watch the film and go play the role-playing game.

Now I need to finish the reading assignment for my book club before Tuesday night. That should give me good motivation to read as much as I can during work breaks.

Reading Challenge (Day 1)

I managed it. Read books for two hours today. Finished one book (A Writer Prepares by Lawrence Block), and continued another (the novelization of the movie Labyrinth).

Even though I love the movie, the novelization is slow going. I guess there’s a reason critics complained about the film’s plot. It is rather episodic, and while it works perfectly well in the movie — where we get to experience all the visual wonder of Jim Henson’s creatures and puppetry — it works less well on the page where the wonderful imagery is somewhat lost. It’s not that the author doesn’t describe things almost exactly as they appear in the film, but that kind of description doesn’t capture the magic of the visual effects. The book needed to be much less a rendering of the movie into words and much more an attempt to capture the tone and spirit of the movie (but perhaps with slightly different characterization, imagery, and plot). Sarah is also much less engaging on the page than she is in the movie. Credit to Jennifer Connelly for making that character somewhat interesting and relatable because the book version is not. This just goes to show (again) that books and movies are two different media and what works in one medium doesn’t always work in another.

Also read some Dungeons and Dragons source books and my book club book, Pachinko. Might even sneak in some reading of Jonathan Hickman’s Avengers comics later tonight.

All in all, the first day was a success. But it was also Saturday. Tomorrow should be another easier day to get some reading done, but Monday and the rest of the work week will be the real test. Can I manage two hours of book reading each day while also freelancing? I kinda thought my lunch breaks and morning coffee and such would provide me with plenty of time (or hour or more), but it turns out, I don’t actually have that much time in those moments. Morning coffee is interrupted by kids and household duties; lunch is probably 30 minutes max. I had to sneak time for myself this Saturday to get my two hours. Not sure how easy this will be starting Monday.

But man, does it feel good to read books and not be scrolling the endless wasteland of the internet.

Reading Challenge (Day Zero)

I know I need to be reading more books. Lately, the siren song of social media (mostly Reddit, some Twitter alas) has called me away from my books.

This is bad.

When I get a spare moment or two, or when lunch rolls around, I instinctively jump for my ipad and start scrolling through whatever feed is there, or whatever news site is my go-to (nytimes.com or freep.com or NPR), and my brain just kinda turns off and I surf through the headlines. It’s all very useless (except for those times when I find out there’s been a disastrous chemical spill into my local river…).

But that’s just it. There are a few times where scrolling through headlines has been good, where I’ve found important, relevant news and become more informed (like that horrendous and criminal chemical spill disaster). These times are few and far between, of course, but they are the drug that keeps me coming back. I want to stay informed, I want to keep abreast of the news of the day, and unfortunately, these sites give me what I want.

What I don’t want is to get stuck in an endless feed that sucks up all my reading time. Yes, I’ve added that time limit thing to my ipad so it kicks me off the news/social media sites, but of course, just like Frog and Toad and the cookies: I can click the “ignore” button and get back to scrolling. I don’t really want to throw my ipad away (or my phone, or my computer). Willpower doesn’t seem to be enough.

But I want to read more books.

Maybe if I make a challenge for myself to read a certain number of books, I’ll read more. Or better yet, to read a certain number of hours per day.

Maybe I start the old Austin Kleon 30-Day Challenge.

“Everyday I will read books for two hours… After 30 days I get…”

Not sure I want a pony, and I have taco dinners a lot, so they’re not that special. My life WILL be back if I can start reading a book two hours everyday. So that leaves the fill-in-the-blank option. Not sure what I could give myself for succeeding at this challenge. It needs to be something sufficiently enticing that I can overcome the pull of Reddit, etc.

Maybe if I can read books for two hours everyday for thirty days, I’ll give myself permission to buy a new LP or something equally anti-utilitarian but awesome (like a new book!).

It’s worth a try, I guess.

Input Update 7/9/2022

Listening to: Michael Haydn’s Trumpet Concerto in D

Reading: “Kubla Khan” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge

Drinking: Magners Cider

My reading list grows ever longer. The Coleridge came about because I was rereading How to Be Idle, and there’s a little anecdote about how Coleridge probably got the idea for the poem after walking in the countryside and taking some opium. Does not surprise me. I hadn’t read “Kubla Khan” in awhile, but reading it again was fabulous. Very DCC RPG in a lot of ways.

Other books currently reading or in the queue: The Two Towers, Labyrinth (yes, the movie novelization), On Lying in Bed and Other Essays (by G.K. Chesterton), Jonathan Hickman’s run on Avengers, and Jack of Shadows (this one is in the queue). Plus, I have about a dozen more I really want to start reading in earnest. Too many books. I really need a week off from everything just so I can read. It will never happen, but a girl can dream.

Rule 8

I’ve loved Sr. Corita Kent’s “Rules” for Immaculate Heart College’s art department since seeing them on Austin Kleon’s blog, but of all the rules, Rule 8 wasn’t one that stuck with me. I am much more a Rule 9 and Helpful Hints kinda gal, but the other day I was thinking about the difference between reading a book and writing a book, and I thought of Rule 8: “Don’t try to create and analyze at the same time. They’re different processes.” First, I’m not saying that reading a book is the same thing as analyzing it… but maybe I am? We tend to define analysis as this super-serious and intellectual thing, but at its heart, analysis is to study something with care, to look closely, to learn the nature of something. When we read deeply, are we not doing this? When we delve into a book (not just skim it or run across it like basilisk lizards), aren’t we looking closely? Aren’t we trying to learn the nature of the story, of the ideas, of the author who gave voice to its words?

Rule 8 feels like another way of saying that when we take something in, it’s a different process than putting something out into the world. When I read, I’m looking closely at something that is outside myself: I’m taking it in.

When I write, I’m releasing something from within: I’m letting it out.

And these two processes must be different, though related. I can’t be looking closely at something and studying it with care if I’m in the midst of releasing it. My eye is directed inward when I am creating. It’s only once the thing has been released that my mind’s eye can be directed outward. But it’s the cycle between these two visions that Rule 8 is hinting at. It’s not one or the other: it’s not all creating or all analyzing all the time. It’s creating: putting things out into the world. And then it is analyzing: taking things in from the world. Or vice versa. Not sure it matters which comes first, the creating or analyzing. But it’s the interplay between the two, the cycle. That is what matters. We just have to remember to not try to do both at the same time. We can’t steep the tea and drink it at the same time.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 Jennifer M. Baldwin

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑