Category: movies (Page 2 of 2)

Input Update 5/8/2021

Reading: The Right to Useful Unemployment by Ivan Illich

Listening to: Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto #1

Watching: The Last Blockbuster

 

I have thoughts about nostalgia, video rental stores, Blockbuster Video, the documentary referenced above, etc. that I might riff on in another blog post. Overall, the best parts of the documentary were in watching Sandi the Blockbuster store manager do her thing, and seeing how a humanely-run and community-oriented business can be such an important part of people’s lives (the humanely-run and community-oriented business in question is specifically the franchised Blockbuster in Bend, Oregon, not Blockbuster stores in general).

As far as the Illich book, I don’t know what to think. I was very excited to read it, and it’s the first of his books I’ve tried, but I’m worried that I’m not intellectually up to the task (i.e.: I’m not a good enough reader/not smart enough).

I feel like maybe I’m not getting the nuances of Illich’s points. Based on my reading so far (about 2/3s through), his ideas would fit right in with today’s Covid anti-vaxxers and denialists. And yet, thinkers I admire like Sam Rocha and L.M. Sacasas are Illich guys (as is Mr. Idler Tom Hodgkinson) so I’m not sure if I’m just reading Illich wrong, misunderstanding him, or being too quick to lump him in with the “Free Michigan” people who stormed my state’s capital last spring. Or maybe my reading of the book is right, and Illich would be very much against the vaccine and masks and everything related to slowing the spread of Covid, things I consider to be necessary for the common good and do out of concern for my fellow humans. David Cayley’s piece on Illich and Covid seems to indicate that I am reading him right, which is kinda… bleh.

I was very excited to dive into Illich’s writings because I’ve become more and more disillusioned with our current meritocracy, with our hyper-Capitalist society, and with the ways in which we devalue work that doesn’t contribute to the GDP. But in reading this book and seeing Illich argue against things like gynecology and giving birth in a hospital just seems insane to me. I and/or my daughter probably wouldn’t be alive today without modern obstetrics. His weird swipe against breast self-exams and mastectomies was jarring too. Like, why are you against women getting treatment for breast cancer, Illich?

Anyway, maybe I’m not following his argument or I’m missing some important details. I’m planning to give Tools for Conviviality a try next.

The Things That Shaped Me: Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves

h3ca4lu5thfb3th2oklr

Image courtesy of AV Club

OKAY, so Kevin Costner is kinda ridiculous in this movie: his “accent,” his blow-dried hair, his not-British-ness. He makes Christian Slater look like Daniel Day-Lewis. But hot damn, I LOVED this movie as a kid! Yes, I had ALL THE ACTION FIGURES.

(And secretly, I still love it. Watched it with my husband a couple of years ago, and even though we made fun of it in places, we got caught up in the story, in the adventure, in the fabulous over-acting of the fabulous Alan Rickman. *sniff* RIP, Sir. Also, THIS COMMENT on the AV Club article I linked above sums up my feelings about this movie EXACTLY. Just go read it and relive the Prince of Thieves memories.)

This move is not high art. It’s a big Hollywood blockbuster from an era when big Hollywood blockbusters were a bit goofy. And yes, it is dated. But it’s fun. And it’s larger-than-life. There is something exhilarating about it, despite the silliness and awkwardness. I got the movie soundtrack as a Christmas present last year, just to relive old memories, and I swear, as soon as that opening fanfare kicked into gear, my heart was soaring and I wanted to go sword fighting and adventuring and storming the castle right then and there (and yes, The Princess Bride will be a future Thing That Shaped Me post).

I’ve noticed over the last few years that swashbuckling action-adventure movies like Prince of Thieves not only don’t get made (unless the movies include Pirates and Caribbeans), but that things that do get made (various Robin Hoods, the latest King Arthur attempts, etc.) are all either too bloated, too ironic, or take themselves too seriously. Everything nowadays is done with grim “realism” (something that Prince of Thieves somewhat ushered in, with its more “gritty” aesthetic). Everything is either uber-serious or coated in irony.

There’s nothing wrong with seriousness or irony. In fact, the sequels to Pirates of the Caribbean could use a bit more seriousness (and a little less irony). But Prince of Thieves is serious without being pretentious; big without being bloated; sincere without being (too) sappy. It wears its big heart on its equally big puffy sleeves. And yes, it’s corny. And yes, Costner is not really very good at big speeches or British accents. But the look of the film is fantastic. When I played imaginary Robin Hood adventures as a kid, in my mind’s eye, I was seeing THIS version of England, with its lush forests, gurgling brooks, stony castles, and sunlit glades.

I’m listening to the Prince of Thieves soundtrack right now and my soul is roused. For all its “grittiness” at the time, Prince of Thieves is really a sweeping classic adventure. I’m curious if a film like that would work today. Could a story with that much sincerity and bigheartedness and over-the-top cheese survive our jaded culture? I’m not sure. It’s a flawed film that rightly deserves some snark. But all I know is that “Everything I Do (I Do It For You)” is coming up next on my stereo, and I’m gonna listen to it and love it without a hint of irony.

Newer posts »

© 2026 Jennifer M. Baldwin

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑